Diversity in the Workplace Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Assorted variety in the Workplace - Essay Example Promoting and augmenting on decent variety in the working environment has become a basic administration issue today (Thiederman, 2008). The authority and supervisory crews in associations need to perceive that work environment condition is broadening, developing, and evolving. The executives and representatives must be prepared to esteem multicultural contrasts in the two clients and partners with the end goal for everybody to be taken care of with poise. Taking into account that overseeing decent variety stays a significant authoritative test, pioneers and administrators ought to gain proficiency with the aptitudes required in a multicultural and differing condition (Devoe, 1999). This paper will examine different parts of decent variety in the working environment. For the most part, assorted variety is characterized as understanding, esteeming, celebrating, tolerating, and recognizing contrasts among individuals with respect to ethnicity, race, sex, otherworldly practice, age, open help status, class, sexual direction, and mental and physical capacity (Shakhray, 2009). In the wake of globalization, assorted variety issues are viewed as basic and are anticipated to turn out to be much progressively basic in the coming years in such a case that expanding contrasts in the populaces around the globe. All things considered, associations are required to concentrate on assorted variety especially inside the work setting and to search for methods of turning out to be totally comprehensive associations since decent variety has the capability of coming about to more noteworthy upper hands and efficiency. Decent variety particularly in the working environment is accepted to be a significant serious resource that any association can't bear to overlook (Devoe, 1999). Esteeming and overseeing decent variety is a significant part of powerful individuals the board that can go far in improving efficiency and fulfillment in the work environment. Segment changes, for example, t he authoritative restructurings, equivalent open door enactment, and ladies in the work environment will require associations to evaluate and audit their acts of the executives, just as to create inventive and new ways to deal with oversee individuals. Such changes will build client care and work execution (Harvey and Allard, 2005). There is no uncertainty that assorted variety in the work environment is a reality around the globe. this isn't just reflected in the authoritative segment patterns, yet additionally in how issues are being tended to in the working environment including the issues of incapacity convenience, adaptable work game plans, senior consideration and youngster care among others (Thiederman, 2008). Assorted variety is advantageous from multiple points of view to the hierarchical all in all and furthermore to the administration and workers. Despite the fact that representatives are reliant in the workplace, regarding contrasts of people can fundamentally build prof itability. Working environment assorted variety can expand advertising openings, business picture and inventiveness. In the advanced time when imagination and adaptability are basic to seriousness, working environment assorted variety is significant for the achievement of any association (Lewis, 2000). Appropriate administration of decent variety in the work environment can give an unmistakable favorable position in this period of upgraded intensity. Different investigations have indicated that heterogeneity advances efficiency and inventiveness. Also, heterogeneous gatherings have shown to deliver better answers for difficulties inside a working environment

A Simple SaaS Marketing Strategy For Amazing Results (+14 Templates)

A Simple SaaS Marketing Strategy For Amazing Results (+14 Templates) Advertising system appears to be unique for everybody. In-house showcasing teamsâ often do everything - from web based life advertising to mark situating. Agenciesâ handle advertising for customers in different verticals. What's more, today, theres a new variety of advertiser in a field with remarkable difficulties of their own: SaaS promoting. Along these lines, if youre in SaaS promoting, youre completely in the correct spot. Since in this post, youre going to get all that you have to begin a demonstrated SaaS advertising technique. Sick offer with you a 3-phase SaaS advertising system: Web traffic: how to get it and why its your backbone. Email advertising: how email can be a motor for monstrous development. Leads: how to support your crowd into leads for your business group. To do this, you get a monstrous heap of 14 formats to kick you off with this SaaS advertising system: A 3-asset SEO Copywriting Template Bundle for creating most extreme web traffic. A 9-asset Email Marketing Template Bundle for growing a productive rundown. A Call-To-Action control for changing over more preliminary information exchanges and leads. A Marketing Research Process manual for get (and keep) new clients. Download your SaaS advertising pack now... ^^^ ... also, here we goâ ðÿˆ A Simple SaaS Marketing Strategy For Amazing Results (+ 14 Templates)What Is SaaS Marketing? Things being what they are, what is SaaS advertising? SaaS advertising is the way toward advancing and selling a product item with permit, or repeating income, capital. SaaS is an abbreviation that signifies Programming as a Service. And it alludes to an organization manufactures and sells programming accessible to anybody with a web association. The first SaaS organization really began, harking back to the '90s by selling floppy circles. In the wake of hitting difficult situations, they rotated and started selling programming on the web (and in the long run sold for billions). Today, SaaS promoting (and organizations) are standard - and about equivalent with being a startup. For more setting, here are a few instances of SaaS organizations: Salesforce: The most well known client relationship the executives (CRM) stage on the planet. Radio: A client commitment stage for deals, advertising, and backing. Autopilot: A natural showcasing mechanization stage. Slack: The correspondence center for groups and correspondence. : The world's top rated showcasing calendarâ and advertising the executives stage. (Believe it or not, we're a SaaS organization too!)What is SaaS showcasing about? Get the total guide (and 14 free formats) here:Where Your SaaS Marketing Strategy Starts While a significant number of a similar advertising standards apply, there are extraordinary objectives and key execution pointers (KPIs) you ought to be after as a SaaS advertiser. Since your objectives decide your activities, they are the North Star for your whole system. To begin, thereâ are three major measurements each SaaS advertiser should work to impact: Web traffic Email endorsers Qualified leads You may be thinking, However shouldn't something be said about clients?! Shouldn't something be said about preliminary information exchanges?! Shouldn't something be said about a completely loaded lunch room to control my cerebrums?! Extraordinary inquiries. The extraordinary news is, clients, preliminaries, and marvelous advantages (for being fruitful) will come when you ace these three measurements. Truth be told, 's fast growthâ as a SaaS startup is a demonstration of that. We followed precisely this way. Truth be told, our CEO laid out our whole development procedure in his book,â 10x Marketing Formula. Suggested Reading: The Best Formula For 10X Marketing Growth Is Here Why These SaaS Marketing Metrics Work Things being what they are, the reason do these three measurements work? Since, when sought after together, they become a total SaaS showcasing channel that will create results long haul. Promoting pipes (otherwise called buy or deals channels) represent the periods of the purchasing cycle from ignorance of an item entirely through to making a real buy. Here is the means by which each KPI fits into this fundamental showcasing channel: Disclosure: web traffic fills the nonstop revelation of your image. Thought: email promoting helps sustain your traffic into qualified leads. Buy: leads are changed over into preliminary recruits and clients by means of deals or self-serve forms. Suggested Reading: How to Select Marketing Metrics and KPIs to Monitor Center Your One Metric That Matters Stage one in your SaaS promoting venture is to utilize a rule called One Metric That Matters (1MTM). It's a basic method to organize and execute against your most significant measurement. The 1MTM framework assists advertisers with concentrating on each huge measurement in turn. In this way, your SaaS promoting technique is handled successively. Most of your exertion will be filled growing (1) your traffic, (2) your email rundown, and afterward (3) your quality leads. The 1MTM framework works for two reasons: center and order. Concentrate On Your 1MTM To begin with, your group will concentrate totally on expanding your 1MTM. This liberates you from getting amassed by the consistent torrent of popcorn measurements. Rather than pursuing ten things without a moment's delay, you'll take a shot at the most elevated need at once. This will keep your eyes bolted on a solitary point, the one piece of the business we have chosen to esteem more exceptionally than some other. Control To Grow Your 1MTM Second, this sort of center makes discipline. The force here is thatâ focusing everything on your 1MTM makes your group absolutely responsible to expanding it. Consider it like this.... Envision you're a showcasing administrator overpowered by attempting to become your company’s social after, site traffic, email rundown, and leads. You'd be swimming measurements, dashboards, spreadsheets, and contending priorities.â ^^^ And this may sound natural, as of now... Be that as it may, where the 1MTM sparkles is if you somehow managed to take a gander at all of those information, you'd learn you can growâ all of thoseâ metrics as long as you drive huge amounts of value web traffic. In this way, as you increment traffic, the remainder of the measurements downstream deal with themselves. Along these lines, we should bounce into your first 1MTM, getting web traffic. Here's the manner by which to get your SaaS business to your first 1MTMSaaS Marketing: Grow Relevant Web Traffic Web traffic is the place your SaaS advertising pipe will (almost) consistently start. Our organization has developed on the wings of substance marketing. And about 100 percent of our clients have begun as inquisitive guest on our site. Along these lines, your first objective is to develop your significant web traffic after some time. We propelled our site around five years back. Also, as should be obvious, we began where every other person does: with no traffic, no leads, and no clients. The cool part is the manner by which we've developed our traffic from nothing to around 1,500,000 site hits for every month... ...to a great extent for nothing! Which is extraordinary news in case you're a bootstrapped startup, as are we. We've developed our web traffic by putting vigorously in: Content promoting, Site design improvement (SEO), Furthermore, parting with magnificent promoting devices. Suggested Reading: How Long Should a Blog Post Be to Get the Most Traffic and Shares? Content Marketing Here's the arrangement. Content advertising isn't new. It's wide-scale appropriation is decades old at this point. Be that as it may, actually content promoting is as yet feasible - and will keep on being so into the uncertain future. The Content Marketing Institute characterizes content advertising along these lines: Content advertising is a key showcasing approach concentrated on making and conveying significant, important, and reliable substance to draw in and hold a plainly characterized crowd - and, at last, to drive gainful client activity. Content advertising can be anything from... âÅ" Ã¯ ¸  blogging... ðÿ„ to distributing whitepapers... ðÿž™ to facilitating a web recording... ðÿ ¹ to video showcasing. Regardless of what substance you're making, the key point is to drive productive client activity. We SaaS advertisers aren't in the matter of being smart with our substance. We're in the matter of transforming guests into clients! The most ideal approach to do this is by making content that fits into your content center. Your substance center comes to an obvious conclusion regarding the worth your business gives and what your crowd thinks about. This single guideline causes you drive pertinent web traffic better than all else I've at any point experienced. It drives the transport for each point you decide to make content around. For instance, suppose your SaaS organization made an application that helps individuals with individual planning. Furthermore, in light of the fact that your 1MTM is developing web traffic, you've decided to put resources into blogging as your essential type of substance advertising. To pick content center subjects, answer two inquiries: What significant worth does our product add to our clients? What related issues does our crowd care about understanding? By picking subjects that fit the two measures, you're set to drive gainful client activity. Thus, blog subjects may appear as though this for your anecdotal individual planning SaaS startup: âÅ"… How to Stick to a Budget just because âÅ"… 5 Areas You're Spending Too Much and Blowing Through Your Budget ⠝Å" What is the Future of Finance? Where the Economy is Headed Those are quite fundamental models. Be that as it may, the fact of the matter is that, while a considerable lot of your crowd individuals might be keen on the economy, the point doesn't have an immediate association with the worth your planning programming gives. Though the initial two have an immediate association. Staying inside your substance center guarantees you'll generally make content that drives important traffic... ...which means guests who mayâ actually become clients since they have torment your item really unravels. Suggested Reading: How to Create a Marketing Budget Plan Drive Massive Traffic With SEO Presently, if the substance center delineates for youâ what to talk... The following two traffic switches advises youâ how to get individuals to see it... Web optimization is a time tested strategy for increasing predictable traffic. Web search tool Land characterizes it

Will Justice Be Served Dostoevsky’s Depiction of Justice in The Brothers Karamazov - Literature Essay Samples

One of the major themes of Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov is the concept of justice, both earthly and divine. Dostoevsky investigates the differences between the two forms and examines several aspects of justice. The novel introduces several different philosophies on justice and shows what the people who follow each are like. The investigation of these concepts culminates in a trial, which is the setting for the final demonstration of the power of divine justice. Earthly justice is the far more basic concept introduced in the novel. It simply is the idea of the actual justice system, laws imposed by the government, trials, and the punishments handed down by them. In the novel, earthly justice is represented by several characters with careers in law enforcement, who are introduced towards the end of the novel when Dmitry’s arrest is imminent. Guilt under the system of earthly justice means that the person actually committed the crime he or she is being accused of. For example, in this novel, Dmitry is guilty under earthly justice if he actually killed his father and stole the money that his father had hidden. His previous thoughts and desires are not relevant to whether or not he is guilty, all that matters is if he performed the action he is being accused of. Under the system of earthly justice, it is the burden of those who are responsible for upholding justice to find the concrete evidence that the person they are accusing has committed the crime. This evidence should involve outside witnesses and some physical evidence that helps establish that the person who is accused was definitely involved.In contrast, divine justice is the moral code as handed down by religion. The punishment under the system of divine justice is ending up in Hell rather than Heaven after one’s death. The system of divine justice is based on the notion of man’s immortality. The only punishment received during earthly life is the burden placed on pe ople by their own consciences, which are really just the ingrained teachings of religion helping to prevent them from ending up eternally damned. People may avoid punishment in the afterlife through atonement. One of the major distinctions made between divine and earthly justice is the distinction between sins of omission and sins of commission. Divine justice stands by the principle that sins of omission are worse than sins of commission and should be more severely punished. Manipulating someone else to commit the crime for you is infinitely worse than committing the crime yourself, as it means that you are not only guilty of desiring that a crime be committed, you are responsible for someone else committing a crime. However, in earthly justice the only sin that can be punished is the sin of commission. It is not up to the juries and judges to punish those who lead others into temptation; that is something that must be left up to God. Brothers Karamazov demonstrates many occasions of sins of omission. Smerdyakov is a major agent of temptation and is responsible for quite a number of sins in other people. He does not seem to have any punishment meted out to him; his suicide is not a result of guilt, but rather a method of revenge upon the Karamazov family. He sets up the murder of Fyodor Pavlovich and his own suicide in such a way that all members of the Karamazov family end up hurt. Smerdyakov is depicted as the one truly conscienceless character in the novel. He is the living proof of what would happen to all of society if the belief in God and immortality did not exist. He does not fear earthly justice and doesn’t believe that there is divine justice. Without the threat of divine justice to keep him within the bounds of the moral code, he does whatever he wants in order to obtain the revenge he’s sought for years. He exists in order to lead others into the temptations of doing evil, simultaneously committing sins of commission and omission, al l for his own selfish purposes.While Smerdyakov is depicted as the tempter and foil for Ivan Karamazov, Grushenka bears her fair share of the sins of omission as well. When Dmitry is first accused of the murder, she proclaims her own guilt, which is quite true under the principles of divine justice. The entire affair comes about because both Dmitry and Fyodor are trying to woo Grushenka and Dmitry does not have the money to be able to impress her in the same way as his father can. He believes that Fyodor has money that is rightfully his left over from his mother’s death and thus believes that the 3,000 rubles that he learns Fyodor has laid aside for Grushenka are rightfully his. Grushenka is fully aware of this conflict and encourages it, by refusing to choose between the men. She continues to draw out the competition between them, so that she may continue to enjoy the attention from both. When Dmitry is first accused of the parricide, she acknowledges her own guilt and procl aims her love for him. She becomes determined him to follow him anywhere and to share in his punishment as best she can. The major sin of omission comes from Ivan Karamazov. He allowed Smerdyakov to talk him into making it possible for the murder to happen. He had himself fully convinced, albeit unconsciously, that he had no idea of what would happen if he left town when Smerdyakov asked him to, despite Smerdyakov having all but come out and said that Fyodor Pavlovich would be murdered. He confronts Smerdyakov after being convinced of Dmitry’s innocence and comes to terms with the fact that he is actually highly responsible for the murder. He had previously wished for the parricide to take place, which under the bounds of divine justice renders him already guilty of parricide, and then leaves town to let Smerdyakov do as he pleases. This leaves him doubly guilty, as he had the first guilt over wishing for his father’s death and the second guilt for committing the sin o f omission that would allow that to happen. Not only did he help provide the opportunity for the parricide, but he is the one who helped convince Smerdyakov that there is no God and no reason to obey earthly laws. He also let Smerdyakov know that he desired his father’s death, thus causing Smerdyakov to believe that he was acting on Ivan’s wishes. Ivan ends up terribly ill and hallucinates conversations with the devil. This is a fairly clear example of divine justice being served, as these hallucinations become strong immediately after realizing his guilt and the image is one of the devil. The devil converses with Ivan about all the theories that he has been proclaiming during the course of the novel. These theories are the same ones that he passed on to Smerdyakov, the ones that helped influence Smerdyakov’s decision to kill Fyodor Pavlovich. Thus, the hallucination is a clear manifestation of Ivan’s guilt. The devil is the master of temptation and in re peating Ivan’s theories back to him, helps to demonstrate just how Ivan was responsible for the temptation of Smerdyakov.The devil haunts Ivan up until the moment that he confesses his crime at Dmitry’s trial. Despite the fact that he knows there is no way he can really prove that Smerdyakov committed the crime, he brings the 3,000 rubles in to the court and declares that Smerdyakov is the actual murderer and that he himself is guilty of planting the idea in Smerdyakov’s head. However, by this point he has been driven insane with guilt and needs to confess his crime in order to relieve himself of the burden. In both this novel and Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky depicts confession as one of the most necessary steps for the atonement of sins and the alleviation of guilt. Ivan’s confession allows him to begin atoning for his guilt, which he continues to try to do by trying to help Dmitry escape after the sentence is passed downThroughout the novel, Dostoev sky demonstrates the extent to which earthly justice and divine justice are connected. The characters frequently debate whether there would be any morality in the world if there were no God. If people cease to believe in God, and thus in an afterlife, then they cease to have a reason to follow the moral code that is in place. After all, as Ivan Karamazov states during the trial, â€Å"Who doesn’t desire his father’s death?† (Dostoevsky, p. 651). Without divine justice telling us to honor our fathers and mothers and not to kill, everyone would be out committing parricide. Earthly justice could not have come about or been upheld without divine justice, as there would be no basis for creating laws. Earthly justice is merely a tool which provides a secondary method of enforcing divine justice and helping those who commit sins to atone.The entire trial is a demonstration of the way in which earthly justice can become the tool of divine justice. Dmitry has spent the e ntire novel struggling within his paradoxical personality, attempting to find a balance between his base, animalistic side and his noble, honorable side. After his lengthy interrogation in Mokroe, he has a dream about an innocent baby suffering and realizes that he has an opportunity to shoulder some of the innocent suffering. This appeals to his better nature and he begins to accept that while he has not committed any crime in an earthly sense, he can atone for his past misdeeds by suffering for the innocents. In this moment, despite all his earlier waffling he has found himself firmly ensconced within the honorable side of his personality. This is especially important because up until this moment he seemed to have settled on the baser side. He had gone to use the 1,500 rubles left over from his initial theft of Katerina’s money, which was the one thing that had been firmly anchoring him as not completely ignoble. As long as he held on to that money, he could still return it to her and thus cease to be a thief and return to merely being a scoundrel. When he went to Mokroe, he was ready to spend all that money and die as a thief. Instead, the prosecutors arrive in time to prevent him from committing suicide, and thus enable him to atone for his past sins and embrace his honorable side.During the trial, the prosecutor who had earlier intervened to prevent Dmitry from committing suicide continues to act as the hand of divine justice, with the result that the man who is convicted is not the one who actually physically committed the act of murder. It is not his job to examine the thoughts of the defendant; if it were purely earthly justice he would just be examining his actions. They hear from many people about Dmitry’s proclamations of parricide and use this fact to determine that he must in fact be guilty, and then ignore the evidence that shows that Dmitry is not the one who actually killed his father. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence p ointing to the fact that Dmitry did not have 3,000 rubles in Mokroe, which would be a key point in determining that he did not rob his father and was in fact telling the truth about hoarding the money he had stolen from Katerina Ivanovna. However, since the prosecutors have inadvertently become the agents of divine justice on Earth, they continue to gloss over the facts that disprove their case. It is particularly significant that this occurs in the case of the 3,000 rubles, as the 3,000 rubles and Dmitry’s interactions with Katerina Ivanovna in general are symbolic of his baser side. This demonstrates that Dmitry is not just on trial for the specific crime, which is what an earthly justice trial should be, but rather his whole being is on trial so that he may solidify his rejection of his baser nature and actually follow through on his move towards nobility.There are several other examples of evidence that exonerates Dmitry of having committed an earthly crime being ignored in favor of the prosecutors upholding divine justice. The prosecutors take every incident of Dmitry giving in to his baser side and use that as evidence against him in the interrogation and trial, so that he may atone for all of them and become more firmly settled in his honorable side. They ascribe his lingering over the wounded Grigory as the desire to make sure the lone witness of the crime was dead, rather than the example of compassion it actually was. While Dmitry’s attempt to wipe some of the blood off of Grigory’s face and see that he was still alive was actually an example of his nobler side, the prosecutors are including it among his litany of sins because the action of striking him was purely animalistic. There is no instinct more primitive than fight or flight and it was from this drive that Dmitry struck Grigory; Dmitry had been trying to escape the grounds of his father’s house and panicked upon encountering Grigory and so he acted purely out of an instinct for self-preservation. This is also a truer parricide than if Dmitry had actually killed Fyodor, as Grigory was much more the man who raised Dmitry than Fyodor was. This novel also briefly addresses the issue of mental illness as a defense for crime. One of the strategies of Katerina Ivanovna and the defense attorney is to attempt to get Dmitry declared insane and thus not responsible for any actions he may have taken. However, mental illness has previously been shown to almost always be the result of the victim being overwhelmed by guilt for failing to atone for a sin. Thus, it is no surprise when the doctors who knew Dmitry prior to the trial conclude that he is in fact insane, while the doctor who has been brought in to examine him for the trial concludes that he is perfectly normal. He is using the trial as an opportunity to atone for all his sins, thus he would not be suffering from mental illness when examined by this doctor. The ones who had known him prior to the t rial knew him when the two halves of his personality were still at war and he was beginning to give in to the baser side of things.After all the evidence is presented and both lawyers have been given the chance to give their final speeches, Dmitry is found guilty. However, this verdict is clearly not one being handed down from earthly justice, but instead from divine justice. The prosecution, in using the evidence they did, transformed the trial from a question of whether Dmitry had physically committed the crime to whether Dmitry was guilty of giving in to his baser nature. The defense attorney, rather than try to get the trial back to what it was supposed to be, merely spends his time discrediting the prosecution’s witnesses. All in all, the trial serves to present Dmitry with his opportunity to atone for all his sins of the past and present and then start life after prison anew, so that he may begin to follow his honorable side with a clean slate. Although at first glance this seems to be an example of earthly justice failing and condemning an innocent man, it is in fact just an example of divine justice’s supreme power.

The Difference Between Grasshoppers and Crickets

Grasshoppers, crickets, katydids, and locusts all belong to the order Orthoptera. Members of this group share a common ancestor. While all these insects look similar to the untrained eye, each has unique characteristics. Meet the Orthopterans Based on physical and behavioral characteristics, Orthopterans can be split into four orders:   Dictyoptera: cockroaches and mantidsGrylloblattids: walking sticksEnsifera:  katydids and cricketsCaelifera: grasshoppers and locusts About 24,000 species of Orthoptera  live around the world. Most, including grasshoppers and crickets, are plant  eaters. Orthoptera range in size from about a quarter of an inch long to nearly a foot.Some, such as locusts, are pests that can destroy crops in minutes. Locust infestations were included in the 10 plagues described in the biblical book of Exodus. Others, such as crickets, are harmless and are considered signs of good luck. About 1,300 species of Orthoptera are in the United States. There are more in the South and Southwest; there are only 103 species in New England. Crickets Crickets are most closely related to the very similar-appearing katydids. They lay their eggs in soil or leaves, utilizing their ovipositors to insert eggs into soil or plant material. There are crickets in every part of the world. All 2,400 species of crickets are leaping insects about 0.12 to 2 inches long. They have four wings; the two front wings are leathery and stiff, while the two back wings are membranous and used for flight. Crickets are either green or white. They can live on the ground, in trees, or in bushes, where they feed largely on aphids and ants. The most distinctive aspect of crickets is their song. Male crickets rub a scraper on one front wing against a set of teeth on the other wing to create the sound. They can vary the pitch of their chirps by speeding up or slowing down the movement of their scraper. Some cricket songs are intended to attract mates, while others are designed to warn away other males. Both male and female crickets have sensitive hearing. The warmer the weather, the faster crickets chirp. In fact, the snowy tree cricket is so sensitive to temperaure that it is often called the thermometer cricket. You can calculate the exact temperature Fahrenheit by counting the number of chirps in 15 seconds and then adding 40 to that figure. Grasshoppers Grasshoppers are very similar in appearance to crickets, but theyre not identical. They may be green or brown, with yellow or red markings. Most grasshoppers lay eggs on the ground. Like crickets, grasshoppers can make a sound with their forewings, but the sound made by grasshoppers is more like a buzz than a trill or song. Unlike crickets, grasshoppers are awake and active during the day. Differences Between Crickets and Grasshoppers The following traits separate most grasshoppers and locusts from their close cousins, the crickets and katydids (as with any rule, there may be exceptions): Characteristic Grasshoppers Crickets Antennae short long Auditory Organs on the abdomen on the forelegs Stridulation rubbing the hind leg against the forewing rubbing forewings together Ovipositors short long, extended Activity diurnal nocturnal Feeding Habits herbivorous predatory, omnivorous, or herbivorous https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-is-the-difference-between-grasshoppers-and-locusts.html https://sciencing.com/tell-cricket-from-grasshopper-2066009.html

Socrates s Theory Of Socrates - 814 Words

Socrates was sentenced to death after the trial. One of his friend, Crito, went to the prison and tried to persuade him to get out of here because Crito did not believe this was a just trial, but Socrates refused. One motivation of Crito to save Socrates is pressure of the many. Crito feared opinions from the majority of people who did not know Socrates and him well because Crito might be thought that he did not want to spend money to save his friend. Socrates argued that one should pay attention to wise men who hold good opinions rather than the majority of people. He offered an example of a sick man who needed to value opinions of the doctor rather than the majority due to the fact that the doctor was more knowledge in physical training than the many. Socrates was the man who knew virtue better than the many, so Crito should value Socrates’ opinions rather than the many. If Crito does not fear â€Å"the blame and welcome the praise of that man (Socrates)†, he will be harmed just like the sick man who fails to obey the doctor’s opinions. Moreover, it is not worth for him to live due to fail to follow the guide of the wise man. The point of Socrates is that it is not necessary for Crito to care for opinions of the many because Socrates is the one he should pay attention to. I do not think Socrates’ argument is persuasive. Socrates’ argument suggests that Crito either pays attention to opinions of Socrates or the many. The precondition of Socrates’ argument is that he is wiserShow MoreRelatedSocrates s Theory Of Recollection1216 Words   |  5 PagesI will show that Socrates answer to Meno s paradox was unsuccessful. First, I will explain what Meno s paradox is and how the question of what virtue is was raised. Second, I will explain Socrates attempt to answer the paradox with his theory of recollection and how he believes the soul is immortal. Third, I will provide an argument for why his response was unsuccessful. This will involve looking at empirical questions, rather than non-empirical questions and how Socrates theory of recollectionRead MoreSocrates s Theory Of Knowledge1130 Words   |  5 PagesIn Socrates’ work, Phaedo, transcribed by Plato, Socrates is in jail after loosing his trial. He has been sentenced to death , and is now awaiting to be put to death. On the day of his death, Socrates is visited by a few of his followers who have been loyal for a long time. Fearing his death, they have a last conversation with Socrates trying to get some of the last philosophical knowledge out of him that they can get. In this conversation, Socrates tells his interlocutors a lot about life and virtueRead MoreSocrates s Theory Of Knowledge895 Words   |  4 PagesIn Phaedo, Socrates argued that knowledge is not learned, but recollected. Socrates used the example of sticks and stones, proving that our perception of the stones change. The stones may look equal from one angle, but different from another angle. This proves that we understand Equality, but Equality does not exist in the real world because it cannot be a real object. Socrates stated â€Å"we must then possess knowledge of the Equal before that time we first saw the equal objects and realized that allRead MoreSocrates s Theory Of Justice953 Wor ds   |  4 Pagesjustice?†Ã‚   Socrates addressed this question in terms of political communities and of the individual person or soul.   He does this in order to address the second and driving question of the conversation: â€Å"is a just person happier than the unjust?† or â€Å"what is the relationship of justice and happiness?† Now, assuming these two leading questions of the conversation, Socrates’s philosophical concerns in the discussion are both ethical and political.   In order to address these two questions, Socrates and hisRead MoreSocrates s Theory Of Justice1202 Words   |  5 PagesIn Plato’s Republic, Socrates argues for the importance of living a just life. However, Glaucon asks why any person favors the just life over an unjust one. Glaucon would like an answer regarding this type of justice, and if it is good only for its results or good in itself. Socrates argues that justice in the individual is the balance between sprit, reason, and desire (scc. 435a). Socrates’ account of justice, displays a life in which a justice provides benefits not only for the individual, butRead MoreSocrates s Political Theory Of Politics883 Words   |  4 PagesIn the Gorgias, Socrates develops his account of political theory. He claims that the goal of politics is to make the citizens as good as possible so that they live the best lives. And by making the citizens â€Å"good† he means that the politicians should instill virtuous characteristics such as self-control, bravery, piety and justice in his citizens. He also mentions that in order to practice this craft, politicians should start by first making themselves and the people they associate with virtuousRead MoreThe Theory Of The Forms Figures Into Plato s / Socrates Reflections1471 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Forms are necessary or essential properties of a particular or thing. According to Socrates, these forms have properties which give them a certain causal power. Using the concept of Forms, he systematically constructs an argument in an attempt to prove that the soul exists and must always exist. Although, his complete conception of Forms is not captured in the Phaedo, We can still use this dialectic to address his arguments. In this paper, I will attempt to describe the Forms. To doRead MoreSocrates Vs. Plato : The Essential Themes Of The Meno1633 Words   |  7 Pagesessential themes of the Meno, largely because the dialogue sits nearly at the beginning of western philosophy. Socrates and Plato are working not so much in the context of previous philosophies as in the context of the lack of them. Further, this is very probably one of Plato s earliest surviving dialogues, set in about 402 BCE (by extension, we might presume that it represents Socrates at a relatively early stage in his own thought). Nonetheless, in order to understand the aims and achievementsRead MoreSocrates And Aristotle s Life1491 Words   |  6 Pages forming a foundation upon which Western philosophers build to the present day. Socrates and Aristotle were two key individuals credited for their roles in the advent of Classical philosophy. Men in ancient Greece lived relatively privileged lives (save for war, disease, and lack of indoor plumbing), giving rise to a class of people able to devote time to leisurely pursuits and intellectual inquiry. Indeed, Socrates and Aristotle were far from the only free men in ancient Greece to contemplate truthRead MoreIs Plato s Theory Of Recollection A Plausible Solution For Meno s Paradox Of Knowledge?960 Words   |  4 Pages1301.001 Word Count: Is Plato’s Theory of Recollection a plausible solution to Meno’s Paradox of Knowledge? The general topic is Plato’s theory of recollection. Is Plato’s Theory of Recollection the plausible solution to Meno’s Paradox of Knowledge? Throughout many of his dialogues Plato often concludes that we cannot know something through our senses. He often concludes that we became acquainted with our knowledge in a previous existence. In Meno, Socrates states that, â€Å"As the soul is immortal

Comparison of the Italian Prison System to Ours free essay sample

university of phoenix| A World Apart| A Comparison of the Italian Prison System to Ours| | Matthew Kramer| 4/23/2011| | The Italian correctional system although much older than the American system are very comparable to each other. Both have come from fledgling institutions in the past that have both evolved because of officials in higher positions as well as concerned citizens that have voiced their opinions on how inmates are treated and how they are housed during their sentences. They have both experimented with the Pennsylvania and Auburn style types of correctional institutions.While America has primarily gone with just one of the models Italian prisons have taken a mix of both throughout their country. Their types of institutions are also pretty much the same as we have here with problems with overcrowding and underfunding. Italy has designated three separate penal housing authorities that are divided into three preventative detention institutions these are as follows: The preventive detention centers, the institutions for the execution of sentences and the institution of security measures. However the building of these institutions has been a problem due to funding and has also placed many inmates in cells that are built for one inmate. America also has the same problem with overcrowding and underfunding causing our country to place more inmates in spaces that were not designed for that many people. We will not place more than two inmates to a cell as where in Italy you may see more than two in a cell for a period of time because there is nowhere else to put them.The institutions for the execution of sentencing are divided into sub groups of arrest centers and detention centers. The institutions of security measures are also broken up into prison farms, work homes, treatment and custody centres and judicial psychiatric hospitals. American correctional institutions also have something similar to this although most of these are accompanied under the same umbrella. Inmates that enter the American system initially go to prison and from there unless sentenced differently they will be placed in a half way house or probation and parole house.Mental health inmates tend to stay at the prison while some will be moved to state mental hospitals for further treatment. The population of the two different correctional systems is very different here in America our inmate population is at almost 2. 5 million as of a survey done in 2008 while in Italy their total inmate population as of 1997 forward was at 55,136 and counting but the comparison of numbers to each other is very different. Many argue that this is due largely to our freedom and laws that govern our land and the allowance for the right to bear arms in the United States.Italy is a country of great reform and is always changing their laws this might also have an effect of how many inmates also make it in to prison. While American prisons are overrun much more then Italy’s are this forces us to privatize our correctional institutions to save space and maybe some money but mainly space. Since Italy’s inmate population is relatively low compared to ours but they do face overcrowding due to the limit of prisons they have built they do not tend to privatize the inmates out.Italy’s security levels are also similar to ours in they will segregate inmates that are more violent and volatile than others. The first level which is their high security is designed to hold inmates that have been convicted of a crime involving the Mafia, kidnapping, extortion or drug trafficking. First level prisoners will be assigned to prisons out of their areas that they live they are also not allowed out of their living areas which means anything that they do as far as programming, school, talking, walking etc.The second level which is their medium security and makes up most of their inmate population have all the schooling and programming that is available. The third level or minimum security is the lowest level and are allowed to have little supervision and placed in the least restrictive areas there are. American prisons are generally the same as we have the same levels our inmates are categorized with other levels within these levels that will determine what type of perks they are allowed while locked up. Prison life in both countries probably only differs little due to the prison that you are locked up in to the people that make the laws. For everything else how you have to watch your back and the groups that inmates will place themselves with for protection this does not change just from country to country you will see remains the same. Italy has three types of release that is comparable to America’s parole they are conditional release, amnesty and pardon. Conditional release is the most widely used in the country and is more like American parole then the other two.Inmates can be granted this if they have served at least 30 months or at least half of their sentence. They must have been good inmates while they were incarcerated and also they must believe that the inmate will be successful if released. They still must report to someone and get a job and have a place to live which is the same for American inmates on parole. Amnesty can be granted before or after the sentence and it basically commutes the sentence this was very unpopular and not used very much and since 1992 no amnesties have been granted.Pardons are the same in Italy as they are in America and can be granted by a governor or president. Article 111 of the Italian Constitution which was amended in 1999 will allow the defendant the right to question the accused and all parties to be cross examined. As where before a person could be convicted based on statements made during the preliminary phase of a trial. This allows inmates before sentenced or found guilty of a crime the right to face their accuser and question them as to why they are accusing them of committing a crime.The comparison of the two correctional systems you can see a lot of similarities and then there are vague differences. In my opinion I would take the American correctional system over the Italian one. This is due to the reading I have done and the way the Italian courts and correctional system are set up.

Joan Of Arc Essays - Joan Of Arc, Battle Of The Herrings

Joan of Arc St. Joan of Arc In French Jeanne d'Arc; by her contemporaries commonly known as la Pucelle (the Maid). Born at Domremy in Champagne, probably on 6 January, 1412; died at Rouen, 30 May, 1431. The village of Domremy lay upon the confines of territory which recognized the suzerainty of the Duke of Burgundy, but in the protracted conflict between the Armagnacs (the party of Charles VII, King of France), on the one hand, and the Burgundians in alliance with the English, on the other, Domremy had always remained loyal to Charles. Jacques d'Arc, Joan's father, was a small peasant farmer, poor but not needy. Joan seems to have been the youngest of a family of five. She never learned to read or write but was skilled in sewing and spinning, and the popular idea that she spent the days of her childhood in the pastures, alone with the sheep and cattle, is quite unfounded. All the witnesses in the process of rehabilitation spoke of her as a singularly pious child, grave beyond her years, who often knelt in the church absorbed in prayer, and loved the poor tenderly. Great attempts were made at Joan's trial to connect her with some superstitious practices supposed to have been performed round a certain tree, popularly known as the "Fairy Tree" (l'Arbre des Dames), but the sincerity of her answers baffled her judges. She had sung and danced there with the other children, and had woven wreaths for Our Lady's statue, but since she was twelve years old she had held aloof from such diversions. It was at the age of thirteen and a half, in the summer of 1425, that Joan first became conscious of that manifestation, whose supernatural character it would now be rash to question, which she afterwards came to call her "voices" or her "counsel." It was at first simply a voice, as if someone had spoken quite close to her, but it seems also clear that a blaze of light accompanied it, and that later on she clearly discerned in some way the appearance of those who spoke to her, recognizing them individually as St. Michael (who was accompanied by other angels), St. Margaret, St. Catherine, and others. Joan was always reluctant to speak of her voices. She said nothing about them to her confessor, and constantly refused, at her trial, to be inveigled into descriptions of the appearance of the saints and to explain how she recognized them. None the less, she told her judges: "I saw them with these very eyes, as well as I see you." Great efforts have been made by rationalistic historians, such as M. Anatole France, to explain these voices as the result of a condition of religious and hysterical exaltation which had been fostered in Joan by priestly influence, combined with certain prophecies current in the countryside of a maiden from the bois chesnu (oak wood), near which the Fairy Tree was situated, who was to save France by a miracle. But the baselessness of this analysis of the phenomena has been fully exposed by many non-Catholic writers. There is not a shadow of evidence to support this theory of priestly advisers coaching Joan in a part, but much which contradicts it. Moreover, unless we accuse the Maid of deliberate falsehood, which no one is prepared to do, it was the voices which created the state of patriotic exaltation, and not the exaltation which preceded the voices. Her evidence on these points is clear. Although Joan never made any statement as to the date at which the voices revealed her mission, it seems certain that the call of God was only made known to her gradually. But by May, 1428, she no longer doubted that she was bidden to go to the help of the king, and the voices became insistent, urging her to present herself to Robert Baudricourt, who commanded for Charles VII in the neighbouring town of Vaucouleurs. This journey she eventually accomplished a month later, but Baudricourt, a rude and dissolute soldier, treated her and her mission with scant respect, saying to the cousin who accompanied her: "Take her home to her father and give her a good whipping."